| 1 |
# This syntax is available with OSH too
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
... echo # comment
|
| 5 |
hi # comment
|
| 6 |
there
|
| 7 |
;
|
| 8 |
echo ---
|
| 9 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 10 |
hi there
|
| 11 |
---
|
| 12 |
## END
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
... { echo one; echo two; }
|
| 16 |
| sort
|
| 17 |
| wc -l
|
| 18 |
;
|
| 19 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 20 |
2
|
| 21 |
## END
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
# newlines mean the normal thing
|
| 26 |
echo $(echo one
|
| 27 |
echo two)
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
... echo
|
| 30 |
$(echo 3
|
| 31 |
echo 4) # is this right?
|
| 32 |
| wc -l
|
| 33 |
;
|
| 34 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 35 |
one two
|
| 36 |
1
|
| 37 |
## END
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
echo one $(... echo
|
| 41 |
two
|
| 42 |
three) four
|
| 43 |
echo five
|
| 44 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 45 |
one two three four
|
| 46 |
five
|
| 47 |
## END
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
echo one && false || echo two
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
... echo three
|
| 53 |
&& [[ 0 -eq 0 ]]
|
| 54 |
&& echo four
|
| 55 |
&& false
|
| 56 |
|| echo five
|
| 57 |
;
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
echo ---
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 62 |
one
|
| 63 |
two
|
| 64 |
three
|
| 65 |
four
|
| 66 |
five
|
| 67 |
---
|
| 68 |
## END
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
... for x in foo bar; do echo $x; done
|
| 72 |
;
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
... for x in foo bar; do
|
| 75 |
echo $x;
|
| 76 |
done
|
| 77 |
;
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 |
return
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
# This style gets messed up because of translation, but that is EXPECTED.
|
| 82 |
... for x in foo bar
|
| 83 |
do
|
| 84 |
echo $x;
|
| 85 |
done
|
| 86 |
;
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 89 |
foo
|
| 90 |
bar
|
| 91 |
foo
|
| 92 |
bar
|
| 93 |
## END
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
... echo comment
|
| 97 |
# comment
|
| 98 |
is OK
|
| 99 |
;
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
... echo blank line
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
is not OK
|
| 104 |
;
|
| 105 |
|
| 106 |
## status: 2
|
| 107 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 108 |
comment is OK
|
| 109 |
## END
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
... echo comment
|
| 113 |
# comment
|
| 114 |
is OK
|
| 115 |
;
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
# NOTE: invisible spaces and tabs below (:set list in vim)
|
| 118 |
... echo blank line
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
is not OK
|
| 121 |
;
|
| 122 |
## status: 2
|
| 123 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 124 |
comment is OK
|
| 125 |
## END
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
|
| 129 |
# Notes:
|
| 130 |
# - MakeParserForCommandSub() instantiates a new WordParser, so we can safely
|
| 131 |
# change state in the top-level one only
|
| 132 |
# - BoolParser is called for [[ ]] and uses the same self.w_parser. I think
|
| 133 |
# that's OK?
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
# So I think we can change state in WordParser. (Also possible in
|
| 136 |
# CommandParser but meh).
|
| 137 |
#
|
| 138 |
# self.is_multiline = False
|
| 139 |
#
|
| 140 |
# When this is flag is on, then we
|
| 141 |
#
|
| 142 |
# Id.Op_Newline -> Id.WS_Space or Id.Ignored_LineCont
|
| 143 |
# - and then that is NOT passed to the command parser?
|
| 144 |
# - Or you can make it Id.Ignored_Newline
|
| 145 |
#
|
| 146 |
# BUT if you get 2 of them in a row without a comment, you can change it to:
|
| 147 |
# - Id.Op_Newline?
|
| 148 |
#
|
| 149 |
# Actually this is very simple rule and maybe can be done without much
|
| 150 |
# disturbance to the code.
|
| 151 |
#
|
| 152 |
# cursor_was_newline might need more state?
|
| 153 |
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
|
| 156 |
shopt -s oil:all
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
var x = 'one'
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 |
# Print 3 args without separators
|
| 161 |
... write --sep '' --end '' --
|
| 162 |
"""
|
| 163 |
$x
|
| 164 |
""" # 1. Double quoted
|
| 165 |
'''
|
| 166 |
two
|
| 167 |
three
|
| 168 |
''' # 2. Single quoted
|
| 169 |
$'four\n' # 3. C-style with explicit newline
|
| 170 |
| tac # Reverse
|
| 171 |
| tr a-z A-Z # Uppercase
|
| 172 |
;
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 |
## STDOUT:
|
| 175 |
FOUR
|
| 176 |
THREE
|
| 177 |
TWO
|
| 178 |
ONE
|
| 179 |
## END
|