| 1 | ## our_shell: ysh
|
| 2 | ## oils_failures_allowed: 3
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 | #### fastlex: NUL byte not allowed inside char literal #' '
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 | echo $'var x = #\'\x00\'; echo x=$x' > tmp.oil
|
| 7 | $SH tmp.oil
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 | echo $'var x = #\' ' > incomplete.oil
|
| 10 | $SH incomplete.oil
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 | ## status: 2
|
| 13 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 14 | ## END
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 | #### fastlex: NUL byte inside shebang line
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 | # Hm this test doesn't really tickle the bug
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 | echo $'#! /usr/bin/env \x00 sh \necho hi' > tmp.oil
|
| 21 | env OILS_HIJACK_SHEBANG=1 $SH tmp.oil
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 24 | hi
|
| 25 | ## END
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 | #### Tea keywords don't interfere with YSH expressions
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 | var d = {data: 'foo'}
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 | echo $[d.data]
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 | var e = {enum: 1, class: 2, import: 3, const: 4, var: 5, set: 6}
|
| 34 | echo $[len(e)]
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 37 | foo
|
| 38 | 6
|
| 39 | ## END
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 | #### Catch AttributeError
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 | var s = 'foo'
|
| 44 | echo s=$s
|
| 45 | var t = s.bad()
|
| 46 | echo 'should not get here'
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 | ## status: 3
|
| 49 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 50 | s=foo
|
| 51 | ## END
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 | #### Command sub paren parsing bug (#1387)
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 | write $(if (true) { write true })
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 | const a = $(write $[len('foo')])
|
| 59 | echo $a
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 | const b = $(write $[5 ** 3])
|
| 62 | echo $b
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 | const c = $(
|
| 65 | write $[6 + 7]
|
| 66 | )
|
| 67 | echo $c
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 70 | true
|
| 71 | 3
|
| 72 | 125
|
| 73 | 13
|
| 74 | ## END
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 | #### More Command sub paren parsing
|
| 78 |
|
| 79 | write $( var mylist = ['for']; for x in (mylist) { echo $x } )
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 | write $( echo while; while (false) { write hi } )
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 | write $( if (true) { write 'if' } )
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 | write $( if (false) { write 'if' } elif (true) { write 'elif' } )
|
| 86 |
|
| 87 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 88 | for
|
| 89 | while
|
| 90 | if
|
| 91 | elif
|
| 92 | ## END
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 | #### don't execute empty command
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 | shopt --set ysh:all
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 | set -x
|
| 99 |
|
| 100 | try {
|
| 101 | type -a ''
|
| 102 | }
|
| 103 | echo "type -a returned $_status"
|
| 104 |
|
| 105 | $(true)
|
| 106 | echo nope
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 | ## status: 127
|
| 109 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 110 | type -a returned 1
|
| 111 | ## END
|
| 112 |
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 | #### Do && || with YSH constructs make sense/
|
| 115 |
|
| 116 | # I guess there's nothing wrong with this?
|
| 117 | #
|
| 118 | # But I generally feel && || are only for
|
| 119 | #
|
| 120 | # test --file x && test --file y
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 | var x = []
|
| 123 | true && call x->append(42)
|
| 124 | false && call x->append(43)
|
| 125 | pp test_ (x)
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 | func amp() {
|
| 128 | true && return (42)
|
| 129 | }
|
| 130 |
|
| 131 | func pipe() {
|
| 132 | false || return (42)
|
| 133 | }
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 | pp test_ (amp())
|
| 136 | pp test_ (pipe())
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 139 | ## END
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
|
| 142 | #### shvar then replace - bug #1986 context manager crash
|
| 143 | source --builtin ysh/shvar.ysh
|
| 144 |
|
| 145 | shvar FOO=bar {
|
| 146 | for x in (1 .. 500) {
|
| 147 | var Q = "hello"
|
| 148 | setvar Q = Q=>replace("hello","world")
|
| 149 | }
|
| 150 | }
|
| 151 | echo $Q
|
| 152 |
|
| 153 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 154 | world
|
| 155 | ## END
|
| 156 |
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 | #### Parsing crash - bug #2003
|
| 159 |
|
| 160 | set +o errexit
|
| 161 |
|
| 162 | $SH -c 'proc y (;x) { return = x }'
|
| 163 | echo status=$?
|
| 164 |
|
| 165 | $SH -c 'func y (;x) { return = x }'
|
| 166 | echo status=$?
|
| 167 |
|
| 168 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 169 | status=2
|
| 170 | status=2
|
| 171 | ## END
|
| 172 |
|
| 173 |
|
| 174 | #### proc with IFS= read -r line - dynamic scope - issue #2012
|
| 175 |
|
| 176 | # this is an issue with lack of dynamic scope
|
| 177 | # not sure exactly how to handle it ...
|
| 178 |
|
| 179 | # shvar IFS= { read } is our replacement for dynamic scope
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 | proc p {
|
| 182 | read -r line
|
| 183 | write $line
|
| 184 | }
|
| 185 |
|
| 186 | proc p-ifs {
|
| 187 | IFS= read -r line
|
| 188 | write $line
|
| 189 | }
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 | #set -x
|
| 192 |
|
| 193 | echo zz | p
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 | echo yy | p-ifs
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 198 | zz
|
| 199 | yy
|
| 200 | ## END
|
| 201 |
|
| 202 | #### func call inside proc call - error message attribution
|
| 203 |
|
| 204 | try 2> foo {
|
| 205 | $SH -c '
|
| 206 | func ident(x) {
|
| 207 | return (x)
|
| 208 | }
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 | proc p (; x) {
|
| 211 | echo $x
|
| 212 | }
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 | # BUG: it points to ( in ident(
|
| 215 | # should point to ( in eval (
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 | eval (ident([1,2,3]))
|
| 218 | '
|
| 219 | }
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 | cat foo
|
| 222 |
|
| 223 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 224 | ## END
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
|
| 227 | #### Crash in parsing case on EOF condition - issue #2037
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 | var WEIGHT = ${1:-}
|
| 230 | case (WEIGHT) {
|
| 231 | "-" { echo "got nothing" }
|
| 232 | (else) { echo $WEIGHT
|
| 233 | }
|
| 234 |
|
| 235 | ## status: 2
|
| 236 | ## STDOUT:
|
| 237 | ## END
|